Are we now getting bored with Lalitgate :
Is it not terrible to see the same Lalitgate invading your house every time you switch on the tv set ?
It is often seen that when politicians make a mistake, the opposition makes a hue and cry and the ruling party stalls the issue till it dies its own death. This is when there is no criminality involved.
In case the issue refuses to die its own death, then the rulers may initiate an inquiry to assuage the hurt of the people and the matter gradually goes out of currency.
In case there is a criminal aspect to the accusations, someone or other goes to courts and gets the courts to order for the issue being examined and scrutinised by a suitable investigating agency.
In certain cases, it has been seen that the courts have taken cognisance of the issues suo motto and have ordered the relevant authorities to submit the matter for the courts examination.
It is seen that in the case of Lalitgate, there is too much discussion on the media but so far no one has gone to a court of law, and no court has taken suo motto cognisance of the issues so far.
Does it mean that there is no substance in the accusations and that at least there is no criminal aspect that may be taken up in a court of law that may lead to successful prosecution of the accused ?
If it is so then why are the opposition parties crying hoarse on this issue ?
If the opposition is sure of its arguments, then why not haul up the accused to a court of law ?
No comments:
Post a Comment